EmperorX
First Lieutenant   Posts: 20 Registered: 9/27/2005 Status: Offline
|
 posted on 10/13/2005 at 01:31 |
Are you more of an Ibanez dude or a Jackson guy? Why?  ____________________
Just because it\'s not a sin, doesn\'t mean it can\'t be.
|
| |
brian
Moderator   Posts: 1038 Registered: 12/22/2003 Status: Offline |
posted on 10/13/2005 at 09:35, Reply 1 |
I would say neither..... In the same class I have a original 1988 Hamer
California with 27 frets,one humbucker and one single.
It list for $1600 back then and they stopped making them. It's a shame
because this guitar simply kills in tone and playablility.
|
| |
Telefreak
Moderator  Posts: 440 Registered: 1/12/2004 Status: Offline |
posted on 10/17/2005 at 12:09, Reply 2 |
Neither really, those names just conjour up images of pointy super
strats.
Gimme a Fender any day ____________________
Technology, not technique
|
| |
brian
Moderator Posts: 1038 Registered: 12/22/2003 Status: Offline |
posted on 10/17/2005 at 17:01, Reply 3 |
Really it doesn't matter it's all about the playing!
|
| |
Telefreak
Moderator Posts: 440 Registered: 1/12/2004 Status: Offline |
posted on 10/18/2005 at 19:51, Reply 4 |
It's a bit shallow o get all hung up on looks, I'll admit.
But I wouldn't want to play something that I thought was ugly ____________________
Technology, not technique
|
| |
Spidercents
Moderator  Posts: 1002 Registered: 7/29/2004 Status: Offline |
posted on 10/20/2005 at 01:37, Reply 5 |
Im more of a gibson guy however I would play an Ibanez or a jackson if it
played and sounded nice and stayed in tune...Im not fussy...gimme a guitar
and plug it in man.
[Edited on 10/20/2005 by Spidercents] ____________________
Treat people the way you would want to be treated.
|
| |
godofsolo
First Lieutenant  Posts: 4 Registered: 11/21/2005 Status: Offline |
posted on 11/21/2005 at 18:39, Reply 6 |
I've got both and my Ibanez is much more playable than my Jackson/Charvel.
They both play great but my Charvel( made by same people as jackson) is
always giong out of tune even though it's like a $1000 guitar.
IBANEZ! :rockout: :4pieceband: ____________________
LEADER OF GF SHRED MAFIA!!!
PM me to Join!
|
| |
docc
First Lieutenant Posts: 13 Registered: 11/26/2005 Status: Offline |
posted on 11/26/2005 at 18:44, Reply 7 |
Ibanez Jem 777 and Artist 2000 f.e. are completely different instruments.So
are Jackson alder body models and mohogany Scott Jan model.Ibanez or
Jackson,Ibanez or Ibanez,Jackson or Jackson-it depends on the tone you are
looking for.
The mainstream Ibanez models got a little wider and thinner neck and great
playability.Jacksons have the advantage of the compound-radius neck.
So I would prefer to have both.
|
| |
ZeldaMentalEvil
First Lieutenant  Posts: 21 Registered: 2/27/2004 Status: Offline |
 posted on 12/14/2005 at 03:48, Reply 8 |
| I think both play fine. Ibanez is my personal perference (although i play a
Washburn)...nothing to do with tone or company or anything.just pewrsonal
perference. ____________________
7 days without prayer makes one weak!
|
| |
maxboost
First Lieutenant Posts: 3 Registered: 12/12/2005 Status: Offline |
posted on 12/14/2005 at 12:55, Reply 9 |
I say get a few of each. I have a ibanez, a charvel, a washburn, gibson and
(I just realized i owned all these brands in the past but they were stolen,
and one was sold. ) So I've had 2 of each of them and my favourite is
always whichever one I'm playing at the moment! Variety is great
|
| |
